Loading
Join Us. 170 Million Americans for Public Broadcasting

Our Blog Usage Policy


Want to comment on a blog?

Login and post your comment


Log In
 
 

Register for a free account

Forgot your Password?

SPONSOR
West Virginia Lottery

Classically Speaking

Classical music in West Virginia and Beyond

The Case for Classical Music

(Commentary) Permanent link

Occasionally, we've received comments from listeners saying they don't feel that classical music is important in West Virginia and shouldn't be featured so prominently on West Virginia Public Radio. Some have called it elitist; others just don't feel it’s relevant to the lives of West Virginians. So, I've been going around asking people:

Do you think classical music is relevant to West Virginia? Why and how?

Paul Helfrich, Executive Director of the West Virginia Symphony, starts off the discussion with a thoughtful and well-written essay:

I was glad Mona asked me this question.   There are short answers, and longer ones.  I’ll begin with the short ones:

Is classical music relevant to West Virginia? Absolutely.

Why?  Are there people in West Virginia? Yes? Then that’s why – because all music, including classical music, is relevant to people.  Doesn’t matter what state, or what country.  Music matters to people.

And how?  Well, all music reflects, in some way, the human experience.  It’s one of the amazing ways that human beings express themselves, and record, interpret, question, and celebrate their human experience.  That’s equally true for folk songs, bluegrass, hip-hop, and Mahler’s Symphony No. 9.

Seems pretty obvious to me!

But trust me, as someone who’s spent over 20 years selling classical music events to the public, I know it’s not quite that simple.  I’m well aware of some of the reasons people feel classical music either “isn’t for them,” on a personal level, or “isn’t relevant,” on a larger, society-wide scale.

Let’s start with the “E” word – elitist.  This is one of those words people use without really thinking about what it means.  Webster’s defines “elite” as  “a socially superior group,” “elitism” as “leadership or rule by such an elite,” and an “elitist” as someone who advocates elitism.

So - is classical music elitist?  If you think about it, there’s no way any music, including classical, can be elitist, not in and of itself.

Music is human expression.  It’s not music that can be elitist – it’s people, people wanting to divide themselves from others as not only a separate group, but a superior one.

And classical music does have some unfortunate baggage, in that regard.  Many American musical institutions (the Metropolitan Opera is a good example) were founded by wealthy individuals in the Gilded Age of the late 19th and early 20th centuries who, indeed, did want to separate themselves apart from the public at large.  They wanted an exclusive club, if you will, in which to enjoy musical performances.  This history is, in large measure, responsible for the association classical music has, in the minds of many, with wealth and social elitism.

But after World War II, classical music became a much more populist venture.  Symphonies, museums, dance and opera companies sprouted up in small communities that had never had such resources before.  Corporate philanthropy came of age in the 1960s and helped these organizations grow, along with the birth of the National Endowment for the Arts.

Fast-forward to today, and you’ll find that most arts organizations are greatly concerned with accessibility and being open to the entire community.  Do they still depend heavily on wealthy donors?  Sure – as non-profit organizations, that goes with the territory.  But the days of these organizations as exclusive clubs are gone.

At the West Virginia Symphony Orchestra, we put a lot of time and effort into projects like providing scholarships (and even transportation subsidy) for our school concerts, so that economics do not prevent students from attending.  We also offer low cost Saturday-morning family concerts, and “Symphony Sunday” as an annual performance that is completely free – that in addition to tickets to all our subscription concerts that begin at just $9 for adults, $5 for students and children.  All these efforts grow out of a concern with being accessible to a broad spectrum of the public.

Classical music on public radio is certainly not elitist, because it’s available to everyone, free of charge, regardless of their ability or desire to pay.  Of course, those with the means and the inclination are encouraged to contribute, but most do because they believe in what I just said – making great music available to everyone.  So here in West Virginia, anyone with an FM radio, in their home, car, or workplace, can listen to classical music.  Transmitters from Matewan to Martinsburg make it available.  That is anything but elitist.

“OK, but is it relevant?” we are sometimes asked.

I think each person has their own definition of what is relevant to them, and for most of us, that is constantly changing, as we grow, learn, and add to our own life experiences.  But there are certain things that seem to be universally relevant, at some time, to all of us, throughout human history.  We all are born, have our growing pains, fall in love, and eventually die.  Some of us are fortunate enough to experience life both as children, and as parents.  We have our moments of celebration and of heartbreak, our triumphs and our tragedies.  Anything that expresses human emotion and experience, and does it well, is going to continue to be relevant, as the years go by.

This is why Shakespeare is still relevant, even though we no longer speak English in quite the same way he did.  For instance, what story of young love and sectarian hatred has ever been more relevant than Romeo and Juliet?  What story of hubris and ill-fated machinations more perfectly stated and relevant than Macbeth?

In the same way, has anyone ever expressed a wish for universal peace more eloquently than Beethoven, in his 9th Symphony?  Has a lonely, tormented soul ever spoken so plainly as in the music of Tchaikovsky?

The issues that moved these composers still face all of us as human beings today.

Music, of course, doesn’t have to be “about” anything, and thus we can still appreciate the awesome perfection and formal integrity of a Mozart Symphony or a Bach Fugue, even though these works have no extra-musical agenda at all.  Even without a program, their music still speaks to the values and the humanity of its creators.  It’s no surprise that music of Bach was sent beyond our solar system on the Voyager space probe, with the thought that someday, it might be heard by an alien civilization.  I can think of nothing better to make a good first impression for the human race than this music.

To bring things back down to earth, anyone who thinks that classical music and classical music institutions are no longer relevant needs to consider the New York Philharmonic’s recent trip to North Korea.  As the largest group of Americans to visit that country in over 50 years, the Philharmonic’s musicians made headlines around the world and showed once again how music can bridge serious divides between people and nations; divides of politics, ethnicity, and belief systems.

So what do people really mean, when they question the relevance of classical music and call it elitist?  Snobbery on the part of some associated with classical music may be partially to blame.  It seems human nature for folks to seize on one particular kind of music, decide it is for them, and to look down on all others.  This goes on in all kinds of music, but classical musicians are often especially guilty of a certain intellectual snobbery when comparing classical music to other styles.

In my own view, there is nothing inherently “better” about classical music than rock, jazz, or Estonian folk music, for that matter.  Compared to folk and popular music, which tend to be organized in a strophic way (the verse/chorus “song” structure we all know and love) classical music is certainly more formally complex, and in many cases more technically difficult to perform.  But that doesn’t make it better – any more than heavy metal music that emphasizes really fast guitar playing and operatic singing (I really like that sort of thing, by the way!) is always “better” than simple folk music.  Longer and harder to play does not necessarily make something better.

With that said, classical music represents an incredible tradition and some truly awesome expressions of the human spirit.  A lot of it is really, really, good.  There really is something to the cliché about music that “has stood the test of time.”  There’s a reason we still play the works of Beethoven today, and in order to know it, you have to listen to the music.  It would be a huge mistake for anyone to cut him or herself off from experiencing that, simply because they have been taken in by the unfortunate associations of classical music with wealthy snobs, or intellectual ones.

There is a form of populist snobbery, too, and I think those who criticize classical music on the radio are practicing it.  If classical music makes you uncomfortable, by all means, don’t listen to it, but keep in mind that there are plenty of other outlets available, if your preference is for country or mainstream rock or other more commercially successful forms of music.  Why would you want to deny people the one outlet on the radio dial that provides an alternative?  Wouldn’t that represent a certain tyranny of the mass market – a cultural elitism, if you will?

I would caution anyone about making assumptions about what is valuable or relevant to others – certainly not about what is valuable or relevant to an entire state, like West Virginia. As I noted earlier, each person can and will define relevance for themselves.  Having a wide range of programming available, in our concert halls, on our radio dials, on the internet, and on the television, allows each of us to explore and grow in our own way.  That opportunity is not there if we let the less commercial arts get stamped out.  Public broadcasting has always courageously stood in the path of mass market homogenization.

Together, symphony orchestras and public radio stations play an important role, by making classical music widely available so that everyone has the opportunity to participate.    That’s not elitist – it’s populist, and humanist, in the best senses of both words.



-Paul Helfrich
Executive Director
West Virginia Symphony Orchestra

Hello and Welcome!

 Permanent link

Welcome to Classically Speaking! I'm Jim Lange, the other half of the classical music team here at WV Public Radio. It's a pleasure to host classical music for you through the week and even delve into other musical styles on the weekend.

Welcome also to a new era of interactive discussion for music enthusiasts. It seems that music lovers not only love to listen to music, but love to talk about it as well. I have a dear friend with whom I have had a nearly forty year conversation about music. It never ends it seems. There's always something new to discover or learn about music and sharing it is part of the passion.

Share your thoughts, consider our opinions and join in the topic. We want this to be an open, intelligent forum with people who share our interest in music. Enter with goodwill and responsibility for your posts. Dialogue? Sure. Venting? No. Let's keep this lively, but topic oriented.

You can expect to read, see and hear a lot more about music than we can share on the air. It should prove to be very exciting.

Thank you and welcome again.

 

 

Classically Speaking: Getting started

(Meta) Permanent link
Welcome to our corner of the new West Virginia Public Broadcasting website!

The "Classically Speaking" blog is a place where you can read, see, and hear more about classical music. There will be a special focus on West Virginia, with interviews and commentary from artists in and from the state. We'll also review recordings that we play on West Virginia Public Radio, and bring you classical music stories from around the world. If there's something you'd like to read more about, be sure to let us know.

You can speak your mind by creating an account to log in and post comments (These comments will take a short time appear on the site).  I think we'll have a lot of fun here, especially if we are polite, respectful, and try to stay on topic.

Check out some of our initial posts, including an interview with Gil Shaham and a review of Nigel Kennedy's new CD (both violinists, I know--we will be branching out!). Coming up, we'll have guest commentary from WV Symphony manager Paul Helfrich, an interview with Professor John Beall about his Double Concerto, and learn more about Richard Strauss' 1904 visit to West Virginia from Professor Christopher Wilkinson. 

-Mona

Nigel Kennedy's Mozart surprise

(CD Reviews, Commentary) Permanent link

Always read the small print! I didn't read the liner notes, or a review for Nigel Kennedy's new album before playing it on Music in the Afternoon today. I had listened to a few minutes from each movement, but without listening to the whole piece, I missed quite a surprise at the end of each track!

The surprise came in the cadenzas, the free solo passages found at the end of concerto movements. Often, soloists play a cadenza written by the composer or a famous performer.  Some performers write their own, often in the style of the composer.

Nigel Kennedy has written his own cadenzas, and they head far away from Mozart’s style.

Here's  two short samples


I often like when performers try something new. I've been captivated by Gilles Apap's free, folksy improvisations in traditional classical pieces.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmjGDBWZZFw


I could be more favorably inclined towards Apap because it’s interesting to watch him play. Or is it because it's more obviously a novelty and it's fun/funny? I'm not completely sure what bothers me about Kennedy's cadenzas. It could be that he tried to smoothly insert something that is a rather sharp shift (especially when you aren’t expecting it!), or the addition of jazz-styled double bass accompaniment that was also unsettling, or the excessive reverb.


Nigel Kennedy has recently returned to recording after a hiatus from the classical world, and I’m glad he’s back. This CD of Mozart and Beethoven concertos is not for me (apart from the cadenzas, the Beethoven is just too heavy feeling), but I really enjoy his performances and musical choices on his 2007 release "Polish Spirit," recordings lesser-known romantic violin concertos and two arrangements of Chopin piano pieces.


What do you think? Can Mozart and jazz work together? Is this their best meeting?

“Now is the month of Maying”

(Commentary) Permanent link
Astronomically, spring begins on March 21st, but it feels like spring really arrives by the beginning of May.  May 1st (also known as May Day) falls about half way between the spring equinox and the summer solstice, so we’re at the height of spring right now. 

In merry “olde” England, May Day was a time for Morris dancing, twirling ribbons around Maypoles, and bonfires.  Some traditional festivities are still celebrated, and it’s also a bank holiday (like a federal holiday in the US); so over in England, they’re getting the day off to enjoy all this lovely weather. 

In Germany, they also celebrated with Maypoles and bonfires.  Like many other holidays in modern era, it seems to have become just another excuse to party—a number of night clubs over there are offering the opportunity to “Tanz in der Mai” (Dance into May). 

France added their particular tradition a bit later—in the 16th century, King Charles IX started a tradition of giving Lilies of the Valley to ladies of the court.  We’re not sure if he also started the tradition of receiving a kiss in return for the flower! 

This “Sweet and merry month of May” has been celebrated in music.  Starting in Renaissance England, William Byrd and Thomas Morley offer us some Madrigals for the season.  The music is generally light-hearted and upbeat, which fits the spirit of the season.  Morley’s “Now is the month of Maying” says that:
The Spring, clad all in gladness
Doth laugh at Winter’s sadness


More recent English composers have also celebrated this month.  Edward Elgar penned his May-Song for piano in 1901, and orchestrated it in 1928. 

Tchaikovsky and Fanny Mendelssohn both wrote sets of piano pieces with movements for each month.  Tchaikovsky celebrates the “Nights of May” as part of his set “The Seasons” and Mendelssohn includes May in her collection “Das Jahr” [The Year]. 

Nineteenth-century French opera composer Charles Gounod set a poem by 16th-century poet Passerat celebrating May Day, celebrating love and “the kindly month of May.”  And even Broadway is in on the act, with “Very Warm for May,” the last score that Jerome Kern wrote for Broadway before heading out to Hollywood. 

All this music for May Day can be heard on Music in Afternoon today at 1pm.  Have I missed any other May pieces?  Let me know in the comments…we still have 30 more days of May to celebrate!  

RSS Feed
<< May 2008 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Blogroll

Archive

Subjects

Recent Posts

West Virginia Public Broadcasting is a member station of: